si...@josefsson.org wrote: > >Fundamentally, I believe that forking upstream projects in this way is >bad for users of distributions like Debian. Each project should own the >moral compass of its own destiny, and users can decide what to use if >they agree with that compass. That's why I personally no longer install >Debian for example, because I prefer a 100% free software OS. Right now >user decision is crippled because users cannot conveniently get to the >proper GnuPG package from Debian, and I believe that's bad for everyone; >users, Debian, and GnuPG.
There's a lot of loaded words in what you write there. Debian has *always* added config, applied patches and adapted upstream behaviour of upstream packages to make them fit our needs better. Why should GnuPG be any different? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky, Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I...
