David Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So why haven't we seen this enforced, or has it happend but quietly? > I do note that there is no kemacs.., but there are things like > krpm.. hrm.. I'd have to look at the list, but... one would think that > at least RMS would enforce things under the FSF's protection. So are > we missing something?
If you'd manage to read the copyright on rpm, you'd see: (1) It's written by redhat, not fsf, (2) It's available both under GPL and LGPL. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
