On Jan 07, Julien Plissonneau Duquène <sre4e...@free.fr> wrote: > You are free to join or discuss it here. That DEP has been online for some > years now, it's not exactly happening in the hiding. Nobody mentioned hiding anything, but it's still just a few people chatting in a gitlab issue.
> > WTF? I say instead that in the modern worlds it is a best practice to > > have the packaging repository as a branch of the upstream repository. > Could you please give us a few examples of projects where that already works > out-of-the-box, ie the package is built and uploaded to the archive exactly > as provided by upstream, debian/changelog and all? I mean having the packaging branch in the Debian repository, not in the upstream repository. > > Again, trying to promote personal preferences to a standard. > That's just a set of recommendations, not policy. You are free not to follow With the obvious goal of becoming a standard. It's the whole point of DEPs. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
