Richard Lewis <richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com> writes: > Otto Kekäläinen <o...@debian.org> writes: > >> Hi! >> >>> > Salsa CI is a great system for all aspiring Debian packagers to test >>> > their packages before requesting review from mentors >>> >>> > However, as there are still packages not using Salsa CI, I wonder is >>> > it straightforward enough for everyone? >>> > >>> >>> I think the best solution would be to make it opt-in rather than >>> opt-out? >>> >>> i think the barrier is likely to be "i didnt know you could do that?" >>> rather than "how do i use that?" >> >> Salsa CI is and has always been opt-in. > > oops - i meant the oppposite, ie make people have to opt out of having > it run, rather than have to enable it >
I recently asked on the Emacsen team whether people would like to enable Salsa CI by default[1], and people seems to prefer not to as it could be distracting. Even though I find Salsa CI beneficial and it helped me catch bugs, I think their concerns are also valid. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-emacsen/2024/09/msg00052.html -- Regards, Xiyue Deng
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
