On Wednesday, December 18, 2024 9:26:28 AM MST Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > > I changed my personal preference from DEP-0 to DEP0 as I now consider > > > DEP0 the best option based as I have seen so much of RFC822, dep3, > > > dep8 and DEP14 in use in many places. However, that +22 for DEP-0 is > > > pretty large majority so I have to conclude it won. > > > > "it won", yes, but what did it win? nothing relevant IMO, and I voted. > > > > the sample is way too small to be meaningful, for a start. then his poll > > was hardly announced anywhere. etc pp. > > What sample is large enough? I thought getting 30-40 people respond on > such a topic is pretty good, but glad to read any concrete > suggestions/requirements for a good decision-making process for DEP > changes. Even though this decision is rather small, hearing your (and > others) thoughts on how to make good decisions is valuable for the > future. > > I am also happy to wait longer if you want to do better announcements, > or I can execute your announcement requests if you have a vision of > what is sufficiently beyond "hardly anywhere" yet not spammy.
My personal feeling is that -devel is the correct place to raise this discussion (and a Salsa MR is the correct place to vote on it). Everyone who wanted to participate had the chance to do so. I don’t see any reason to wait before moving forward. -- Soren Stoutner so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
