On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 06:25:11PM -0700, Antonio Russo wrote:
> On 11/21/24 15:19, Iustin Pop wrote:
> > I'm not happy with the heavyness that one gets via gpg just for
> > verifying signatures, so I'd be all for a lighter-weight solution.
> 
> gpgv is lighter weight than gpgv-sq.  Surprisingly, it's not just
> the rustc-static-links-everything problem, since gpgv-static is
> also smaller than gpgv-sq.
> 

That's correct due to some overlinking in the Rust toolchain,
there needs to be some more crate splitting to make it smaller.

-- 
debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev
ubuntu core developer                              i speak de, en

Reply via email to