Lukas Märdian <sl...@debian.org> writes: > But in the end we don't want to bloat our base-installation with > NetworkManager and systemd-networkd is not fit to cover the desktop/laptop > usecase. So why not put some glue around it, to make it all feel coherent, > without limiting anybody in their decision to choose whatever stack they > like?
We have that choice without netplan too. Should users have a choice wrt netplan? Don't they already? Is a base-installation with netplan and NetworkManager less "bloated" than an installation with only NetworkManager? Will netplan and systemd-networkd cover the desktop/laptop usecase, or do you still need NetworkManager for that? Exactly what problem are you solving here? Bjørn
