On Jun 06, Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org> wrote: > I believe the change Luca describes is increasing rlim_max (hard limit) > but not rlim_cur (soft limit), and the code touched by that patch is > looking at rlim_cur, so it should be unaffected anyway - unless some larger > component is raising rlim_cur. Something did, because inn would start reporting ~1G available fds and then explode, and that patch solved the issue. :-)
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
