On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 06:32:47PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: > Am 06.04.24 um 18:29 schrieb Colin Watson: > > There might be some small errors in this, but I couldn't see any when > > eyeballing the resulting uniquified list of Maintainer fields. It looks > > like 78% of source packages in unstable are team-maintained, which can't > > reasonably be called an "exception". > > https://trends.debian.net/#co-maintenance is the best ressource that I know > for this sort of stuff. Thanks to Lucas Nussbaum by the way for creating > this service!
Thanks. Unfortunately this undercounts team maintenance very significantly (by at least 4000) as a result of https://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/MailingListContinuation. Given the timing of that change compared to the sudden increase in co-maintained packages on that graph, I suspect they're mostly being misfiled as co-maintained. I've filed https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/497 to fix this, but even after that's accepted and uploaded, I'm not sure how long it would take to trickle through to UDD; I presume old figures would never be corrected. There's still a discrepancy of several thousand compared to the numbers I found, so I've probably missed something else similar. -- Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
