Bastian Blank <wa...@debian.org> 于2023年11月25日周六 17:48写道: > > Hi Thorsten > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 06:58:40PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > Matthias Klose dixit: > > >, this is not an RC issue. Please stop playing > > > bug ping pong. > > > > If GCC stops supporting an option it used to support, > > and where the GCC documentation say it’s supported, > > it in my opinion very much is an RC bug. > > Thank you for purposefully not mentioning that this only applies if you > use the bothed(?) gcc spec override to build with musl instead of glibc. > Can you show it is broken if using the standard toolchain as asked > by the maintainer? > > The gcc spec also defines which arguments are supported. So if your > spec override does not support a particular one, then it will not work. > > However what I now find interesting is: the Debian gcc 12 on amd64 > got the options -muclibc, -mbionic amd -mmusl for some limited support > for those alternative libc. >
I can reproduce this problem. I will try to solve this problem (by git bisect > Bastian > > -- > I'm frequently appalled by the low regard you Earthmen have for life. > -- Spock, "The Galileo Seven", stardate 2822.3 > -- YunQiang Su