El 12/11/22 a las 13:16, Otto Kekäläinen escribió: > Hi! > > On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 at 01:08, Santiago Ruano Rincón > <santiag...@riseup.net> wrote: > > Aiming to reduce the space used in the salsa infrastructure by the > > salsa-ci artifacts, and to avoid exceeding the size limit in build jobs, > > we (Salsa CI Team) are planning to stop building dbgsym packages: > > https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/-/merge_requests/382 > > +1 > > > We are aware some fellows have pipelines based on salsa-ci's, and we > > would like to avoid breaking their stuff, in case something depends on > > the dbgsym packages. > > The question is: should `DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noautodbgsym` be opt-in > > or enabled by default? > > The proposal to make it opt-in makes sense to me.
Thanks for your answer, Otto. But you could please clarify: do you have any reason for having this opt-in? Do "your" pipelines relying on any of the dbgsym packages? cheers, -- Santiago
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
