On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 09:51:14PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > As Jonas said, an epoch cannot be undone, +really can, regardless when this > > is going to happen. > > I think ignoring when it happens is not the right way to see it. Even if we > assume that > upstream is going to work on this with the same effort, we will still end up > waiting > for a _decade_ for the +really to go away. > > Is tagging this along for so many years really is more worthy than an epoch? > Note that the package might even go stale in such a long time, thought.
BTW, Jonas also said, "is it unlikely that they will reach 22 in the foreseeable future?" And the answer to that is a "Yes", so :) -- Best, Nilesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
