On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 18:08 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > To give some actual examples that IMHO are candidates for accept + bug > report:
Packages with incomplete or incorrect debian/copyright information currently would recieve a REJECT rather than acceptance. The proposal would not change that, just turn that REJECT into a bug report, which you could fix in a second upload to NEW and then the package would be reprocessed and get an ACCEPT or another bug. > I think Paul was not talking about non-distributable software but rather > code that is considered DFSG free but missing proper paragraphs inside > d/copyright which can be easily fixed in BTS. I think completely non-distributable software should get a bug against the package in NEW tagged as wontfix and then the NEW package should get removed with a REJECT mail mentioning the reason. There may be cases where it might be possible to fix some issue with a unredistributable file in an otherwise redistributable package, in those cases a serious bug against the package in NEW should be filed and the maintainer be given a chance to fix the issue. The proposal doesn't change anything with regard to packages with incomplete or incorrect debian/copyright information, that is a separate issue to what this proposal aims to solve. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
