Le lun. 13 sept. 2021 à 20:24, Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org> a écrit : > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 08:19:31PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > >... > > For Wine (and even a wider MinGW-w64 > > ecosystem) we don’t need all that many source packages to be > > cross-satisfiable for the whole endeavour to be useful... > > But you would still need to create and maintain the whole > infrastructure. > > The larger picture is that there are at least 3 big topics: > - cross-architecture dependencies > - partial release architectures > - cross-building a release architecture > > Every single of these topics would be a huge amount of work. > > If you need all 3 as basis for a solution for Wine, > then that's simply not realistic in the foreseeable future. > > > The regressions are significant though: if packages can’t stay > > cross-satisfiable for Debian cross-targets, there’s little hope they can > > stay > > cross-satisfiable for Windows! This means that separate source packages are > > probably the only viable option. > >... > > Separate source packages don't bring any real benefits compared to > just bundling and building everything in src:wine.
No please do not do that. Vendoring is bad and I fight on the javascript side since four years, against it. > > Either would likely imply that Wine in Debian comes without security > support, and the Release Notes stating that Wine should only be used > for trusted local contents. > > > Regards, > > > > Stephen > > cu > Adrian >
