On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 12:11:06PM +0100, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> So the current situation is that we make an active effort to produce two
> different types of installation media: one that works for all users, and
> one broken for most laptops. 
(not just laptops, many other user machines as well)

> Some sort of FOSS version of an anti-feature. Then we publish the broken
> version on the front page, and hide very carefully the version that
> works.
It's the usuall freeness vs usability trade-off, and it's far from being
the only instance of it in or around Debian.

> This absurdly damages our users without improving the state of Free
> Software in any way
I'm sure the opinions vary on both parts of this statement.

-- 
WBR, wRAR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to