Andreas Metzler wrote...

> I am all for declaring a cutoff date (and release) which makes usrmerge
> mandatory and the only supported setup. (Or alternatively make usrmerge
> an unsupported setup.) The current state where we are trying to support
> both and end up dealing with fallout and cannot make real progress to
> the clean state (bash being shipped as /usr/bin/bash and therefore dpkg
> knowing about it) is a waste of developer time.

Indeed. I just lost two hours to realize the build failures of one of my
packages resulted from upstream being post-usrmerge in mind while the
buildds are appearently pre-, and with my local build chroots already
migrated I hadn't noticed beforehand. And now I can only hope the
resulting binaries will run everywhere. The sooner we get out of this
mess the better.

    Christoph

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to