On Saturday, April 13, 2019 10:03:23 PM Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 4/12/19 7:31 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Friday, April 12, 2019 01:08:26 PM Mark A. Hershberger wrote: > >> Package: wnpp > >> Owner: Mark A. Hershberger <m...@everybody.org> > >> Severity: wishlist > >> > >> Package name : python3-git-archive-all > >> Version : 1.19.4 > >> Upstream Author : Ilya Kulakov <kulakov.i...@gmail.com> > >> URL or Web page : https://github.com/Kentzo/git-archive-all > >> License : MIT > >> Description : Archive repository with all its submodules > > > > I'd suggest git-archive-all be the package name. The fact that's it's > > written in python looks like an implementation detail. > > > > Scott K > > And also, having "python3" in the name doesn't seem sensitive. We've > been using "python-foo" as source package names, and IMO we should > continue to do so, even for python3 packages.
This is an application, not a python (or python3) module. If it was a module, then I'd agree. For applications, then language is an implementation detail that needn't be exposed in the name. Scott K
