Michael Stone wrote on 07/03/2019: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 09:02:23PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: >>> I'm actually wondering if this is a good idea.. >>> >>> There are lot of other packages installing cronjobs and people, I would >>> assume, expect that they will run.
cronjobs run even without anacron, they just don't run "anac(h)ronistically". >>> I would personally revert his patch as long as all the cronjobs have not >>> a corresponding systemd .timer >> >> Any thoughts on this? > > What's the downside to having anacron there if a .timer supersedes the > cron job? Having a useless service running is itself a downside; I second the removal. I'll also mention that anacron has been orphaned almost one year ago. Paride
