On 08/01/19 at 13:25 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I was seeking for remaining references to anonscm in packages in UDD. > I've found the following strange hit: > > udd=> select source, version, maintainer, vcs_browser, release from sources > where source = 'r-bioc-deseq2' and release = 'sid' ; > source | version | maintainer > | vcs_browser > | release > ---------------+---------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+--------- > r-bioc-deseq2 | 1.16.1-1 | Debian Med Packaging Team > <debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org> | > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/r-bioc-deseq2.git | sid > r-bioc-deseq2 | 1.22.2+dfsg-1 | Debian R Packages Maintainers > <r-pkg-t...@alioth-lists.debian.net> | > https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-deseq2 | sid > (2 Zeilen) > > > which means the source package r-bioc-deseq2 exists twice in sid. There > is also an entry in tracker[1] mentioning version 1.16.1-1 which should > have gone since a long time. The situation is similar for: > > r-bioc-genefilter > r-bioc-shortread > r-bioc-variantannotation > r-cran-dplyr > r-cran-haplo.stats > r-cran-luminescence > r-cran-phylobase > r-cran-purrr > r-cran-raster > r-cran-rsqlite > r-cran-scales > r-cran-surveillance > r-cran-tibble > r-cran-tidyr > r-cran-tidyselect > r-other-mott-happy > > > Any idea why old versions of these packages might remain in UDD (and > thus probably in tracker since it is reading UDD)?
Did you check the extra_source_only column? Lucas
