On 2019-01-14 12:51 +0100, Markus Demleitner wrote: > Here's the story: Originally (and still reflected on > http://luakit.org), luakit used a date-based versioning scheme. In > that, the last released version was 2017-08-10, which is what's > currently being packaged. > > Meanwhile (and that's not yet reflected on luakit.org), there are > releases on Github (https://github.com/luakit/luakit/releases) that > follow a major.minor scheme, and the upstream maintainer has > confirmed they want to keep that scheme in the future. > > As we bring these newer releases into Debian, we would like to > reflect their version numbers in the Debian version number, too. > > Opinions?
Yep. I think you need to use an epoch in this (classic) case. The learning from this is that if using date-based versioning due to lack an upstream versioning scheme (increasingly common in my experience), it's smart to use 0~$date so you can look smug and switch to (newer) versions if/when they adopt them without needed an epoch. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
