Hi, st 19. 9. 2018 v 13:21 odesílatel Ansgar Burchardt <ans...@debian.org> napsal:
> Policy specifically says to use Breaks in this case: "Breaks should be > used [...] when the breaking package exposes a bug in or interacts > badly with particular versions of the broken package." (same section as > above) > according to this, I can use "Breaks" in situation, where my package is broken with older version of other package and I can "Breaks" older version of that not compatible (interacts badly) package. Am I reading it correctly? Because that means "Breaks" works both way. If A breaks B: A doesn't work correctly with B or B doesn't work correctly with A. -- Best regards Ondřej Nový Email: n...@ondrej.org PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5 6090 3573 1255 9D1E 064B
