On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 01:20:47PM +0000, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > On August 5, 2018 7:41:41 AM UTC, Tobias Frost <t...@debian.org> wrote: > > > >Yes, the TC has the power to decide ultimately about maintainership > >when > >there is an dispute and if involved parties failed find consesus. The > >proposed process does not change that. > > > >As an additional data point, we have processes in place to change > >maintainership without involving the TC, e.g the MIA process. > > Yes, that's sort of true, but not really. The MIA process doesn't > actually determine anything about who a maintains a package. It > determines who is no longer active in the project. The impact on who > the maintainer is is a secondary effect of the MIA process.
The MIA team orphans packages of inactive members. The ITS just the chain of action from O -> ITA -> new maint to. ITS -> new maint. -- tobi
