On Thursday 03 May 2018 02:39 AM, Paul Gevers wrote: > It is the intention that in the (far) future regressions will become > blocking for migration, but until then the added age will probably be > raised over time as a semi-block. > > There is one important note to make here on how to go about regressions > in test cases from reverse dependencies. We recommend direct > communication between the maintainers of the involved packages as one > party has insight in what changed and the other party insight in what is > being tested. More information is available in the britney documentation > [britney]. > > In case of issues, please contact the release team and ci team: > debian-rele...@lists.debian.org debian...@lists.debian.org
I think we need to handle cases like this, https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ruby-state-machines ruby-state-machines and ruby-state-machines-activemodel should go together and even when autopkgtest for the version is unstable passed, instead of reducing the age, it is considered a regression because autopkgtest for the version in testing failed and age is increased. I think in cases where version differs in testing and unstable, regression in testing should not delay migration.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
