Hello, On Thu, May 24 2018, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I realise I am clearly some kind of antediluvian throwback, but: using > the issue tracker means running a massive pile of javascript, and then > creating an account. So people who have not already paid that price > might prefer an email address. > > Also, sometimes one might have a question which is not clearly an > "issue" in the sense that it should be in the issue tracker, or where > some discussion is needed to refine it, or where maybe the matter > needs to be confidential, or somethig. > > Or maybe using a web issue tracker is not convenient right now. (For > example, an email can be drafted offline or when the connectivity is > very poor. Filling in a web form and trying to submit it over a train > wifi, say, is not usually wise.) > > So I think we should advertise both. Thank you for advocating on behalf of users who are not in a position to use the web form, Ian. -- Sean Whitton
