On 12/19/2017 02:20 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Sometimes the license requires listing the copyright holders. In those > cases, the list of holders must be present in the copyright file. In the > rest, there is no need to list them. Only the license matters. > > .oO( should the copyright file be renamed to license to avoid this > eternal discussion? )
Though I haven't seen a single case where FTP masters aren't requiring a copyright holder list for things entering NEW. BTW, it'd be nice if the FTP team were replying in this thread, so we'd have their point of view. It's a little bit pointless thread otherwise. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
