On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 08:41:38AM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Thursday, 21 September 2017 16:11:52 CEST Andreas Tille wrote:
> > May be if cme would have the same effect as wrap-and-sort there is at
> > least no disagreement between the users of both tools any more (leaving
> > those who are not happy with either of them :-P ).
>
> Unfortunately, wrap-and-sort has its own way of sorting: special entries
> (i.e.
> that do not begin with letters) are sorted after "normal" entries. So
> dependencies like "${misc:Depends}" are sorted after package dependencies.
> Usually, sort algorithms do the reverse. May be wrap-and-sort should be
> called
> wrap-and-sort-ish :-p
Sounds like something that improves readability a fair bit.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ We domesticated dogs 36000 years ago; together we chased
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ animals, hung out and licked or scratched our private parts.
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Cats domesticated us 9500 years ago, and immediately we got
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ agriculture, towns then cities. -- whitroth on /.
