Russell Stuart wrote: >On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 21:00 +0530, shirish शिरà¥à¤· wrote: >> >> In short, this alone use-case answers Steve's original question which >> was primarily are there any users who use or would use this tool or >> his time would be better spent somewhere else. I think just the above >> use-case and number of users answers the need for a tool like >> live-wrapper. As has been pointed out by me and others, it just needs >> more testing (documentation and love by devs.) to drive more usage >> forwards. > >I do a similar thing, although not on quite that scale. > >However I thought Steve's question was about maintaining particular >live images, not live-wrapper itself. I too would be very disappointed >to see live-wrapper go.
Definitely, yes. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com "Because heaters aren't purple!" -- Catherine Pitt
