On 2017-05-01.13:02, Marc Haber wrote: > On Mon, 1 May 2017 11:09:26 +0200, Christian Seiler > <christ...@iwakd.de> wrote: > >And as I said in other places in this thread: I personally > >think that the separate /usr <-> /etc scheme is much better > >than just storing everything in /etc, so I would really > >prefer if as much software as possible would switch to that, > > How would you expect the case "local admin has copied over the file > from /usr to /etc to apply local changes, and a new package version > changes its defaults so that the service wouldn't run with an > unadapted configuration any more" to be handled?
Via a NEWS entry? I'd expect _any_ significant change in default behaviour in a package to be announced in a NEWS entry. -- Regards, Scott.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
