Hi, On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 12:51:51AM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> If I understand correctly, the objection was to how sysvinit behaves > (for which I have now opened #851427) - it puts the symlink at /dev/shm and > the real mount at /run/shm. That is the correct approach, and IIRC this is how it was implemented in sysvinit before jessie (/dev/shm is way older than /run), so I'm wondering what triggered the change. Simon