Hello Christian, On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 05:40:49PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 12/17/2016 04:49 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > In my reSIProcate control[1] file, I included the following: > > > > Build-Depends: ... , libssl-dev (<< 1.1) | libssl1.0-dev (>= 1.0.0), ... > > > > pdebuild correctly builds it for sid with libssl1.0-dev from openssl1.0[2] > > > > In the buildd[3] report, it says that libssl-dev is uninstallable on > > every platform, it doesn't appear to try libssl1.0-dev > > > > Is buildd sensitive to the order of the dependencies when multiple > > options are given? Or is there some other glitch here? > > sbuild will always use the first alternative of build > dependencies. If you're doing this to make backporting easier, > then I'm afraid that won't work - you'll have to manually > change the B-D for backports.
Do you know why sbuild is ignoring alternative build-deps? -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
