Hi Ian, 2016-10-31 14:19 GMT+01:00 Ian Campbell <i...@debian.org>: > On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 12:17 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> 2016-10-31 10:38 GMT+01:00 Ian Campbell <i...@debian.org>: >> > If possible I'd also prefer a solution which fixed qcontrol-static >> > without opting out for the normal dynamic/non-udeb binary. >> >> I ran the build tests on amd64, this is why I have not caught this error. >> A rebuild of lua5.1 should fix the problem. >> >> Dpkg changes are on their way, too in the next days. I would ask >> for a binNMU after dpkg is updated. > > Thanks, to check I understand: I should wait for #835146 to be fixed in > sid (which is expected to happen via a dpkg upload in the next days) > and then ask for a binNMU of lua5.1 then qcontrol (or maybe I have > reason to upload a newer qcontrol anyway, we'll see)?
Yes, this should fix qcontrol and maybe you don't even have to ask for rebuilds. I think there is already an archive-wide rebuild planned to make reproducibility-related changes in dpkg take effect thus I suggest waiting a few days to see if you need to ask for binNMUs. Cheers, Balint
