I might have forgotten some important parts, or I missed the announcements when I was inactive for a while. But I am confused by these 2 statements, and would love to get some pointers to learn more:
> On 2016-10-11 15:28, Vincent Bernat wrote: >> Those specific sources are buildable from tools in main (aka >> coffeescript compiler, sass compiler, cat + uglifyjs). There is no hard >> requirement to rebuild from source when building the package. I had always understood that rebuilding from source was a hard requirement. Is this not the case any more? I don't think that shipping a binary compiled upstream should be allowed, so where's the line drawn? On 11/10/16 23:04, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > It remains the originally reported problem, that the sources > (*.coffee and *.scss) are not under debian/missing-sources/. > Probably a normal bug, not serious nor wishlist. I have never heard of debian/missing-sources. What is the policy/documentation regarding this? I have repackaged tarballs many times to add missing sources, I did not think there was another way to do it! Thanks. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho)
