On 2016-10-03 19:32, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2016-10-03 16:52, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > You *are* aware that the current plan is for Stretch to be the last > > release for armel? > > *Now* I am. Planned obsolescence is good for my company, but bad > for customers and environment...
OK, thanks for the heads-up, Steve! I have read the respective discussion now. Not much chance for v5, it seems. (A partial release would be nice for such platforms, i.e. no X11, no Haskell etc.)
