On Sep 11, Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofb...@debian.org> wrote: > 2) would it be possible to create a lirc-ng package and > conflict with the current one, so people can choose the best one for > them? No.
> 3) NMU in unstable seems unfair and possibly a source of troubles for > such a complex package (with complex changes). The current lirc package has obviously been neglected for a very long time and this is shameful. I recommend that you notify to the current maintainer your intent to take over the package, wait for two weeks and then do it. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
