Jonas Smedegaard writes ("Re: copyright precision"):
> Quoting Markus Koschany (2016-08-15 23:02:06)
> > So yes, copyright files are hard and unfun but why should we continue
> > to write them the way we do if we are not legally bound to do so?
>
> Same reason that we should continue to care about ability to install
> multiple major versions of a library concurrently, and that daemons are
> not only linked correctly but also sensibly configured and started by
> default.
>
> Not because we are legally bound to do so, but because we want to do our
> job as distributors properly. We appreciate good quality packaging!
Does that justify REJECTing a package which is imperfect in this
respect, though ?
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
