Is it practical to use both concurrently for a brief period before finally settling, it would require more setup time but would add some insight to a debate that is currently mainly opinion based.
Lee Fuller (mobile) PGP Fingerprint: 4ACAEBA4B9EE1B3A075034302D5C3D050E6ED55A On 30 Jul 2016 3:51 a.m., "Luca Filipozzi" <lfili...@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 07:47:48PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 05:12:01PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Alexandre Viau wrote: > > > > > On 28/07/16 02:40 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > > > > At this point, I'm dropping work on gitlab for debian and moving > to > > > > > > less controversial alternative pagure. > > > > > > > > > > Pagure looks great and I am happy to see that we are finally moving > > > > > towards something that (more) people agree with. > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your efforts, I am impressed that you still want to > work > > > > > on this project even if we are not going to use Gitlab. > > > > > > > > > > Once again, I would like to mention that I want to help this move > > > > > forward as I consider it very important. > > > > > > > > > > Is there a list of things that have to be done where I can give a > hand? > > > > I also looked into pagure and I see two problems: it is not packaged > > > > [...] > > > > > > Note that DSA does not need/want the service software itself packaged, > only > > > its dependencies. > > > > Yeah, I know about it. But packaged software (or at least its deps), > really > > helps. > > Point of clarification: we don't expect software that is written just for > Debian (snapshot.debian.org and udd.debian.org come to mind) to be > packaged. > > We would prefer other software (gitlab, pagure, etc.) to be packaged, if > possible; surely this software is useful to our community and having it > packaged is worthwhile. > > -- > Luca Filipozzi > http://www.crowdrise.com/SupportDebian > >
