Quoting Pirate Praveen (2016-07-11 10:30:59) > Control: severity -1 wishlist > > On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 19:41:17 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote: > > Quoting Pirate Praveen (2016-07-10 18:40:53) > > > This is not a minified file, only browserified. Though ideally we > > > should browserify it in debian, grunt is still not packaged. Since > > > its still a human readable and modifiable format, I don't think > > > DFSG applies here. > > > > The requirement of source format of redistributed code is not about > > it being possible/easy to edit by those receiving it¹, but about it > > being in the format preferred by _upstream_ to edit - e.g. for > > passing patches upstream. > > There is no consensus on it -> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/07/msg00241.html > > Since there is a disagreement here, you may approach CTTE, ftp master > or propose a GR.
You consider the responses you reveived today at d-devel as generally *not* in agreement? I am baffled. Cc-ing d-devel, perhaps others can help clarify. > > If "browserifying" is a process simple to apply and revert, then > > ship the code _not_ browserified and browserify during install (yes, > > I understand that the tool upstream uses for that process is not yet > > in Debian - which either means you need to imitate that process or > > that it is _not such simple process). > > > > Those who feel strongly about this issue should help with > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673727 Right. And until solved Debian packages cannot include that functionality. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
