On 06/29/2016 10:29 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:15:39AM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: >> So is it correct to simply replace EVP_dss1() with EVP_sha1() in the >> above code and it will still produce DSA signatures? Or do I have to do >> something else to achieve the same results? > > I'm not sure why they were removed at this time and not just > replaced by a #define. > > Using EVP_sha1() is the correct replacement for EVP_dss1(), > as the manpage says.
Great, many thanks! Regards, Christian
