Quoting Enrico Zini (2016-04-10 10:44:02) > On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 11:25:34PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> I have seen no sign that Chrome or Firefox developers have much >>> interest in supporting WebID either, and given how I've seen one of >>> the WebID people argue their case[1] with the Chrome and Firefox >>> developers, the little interest they might have had to start with is >>> probably gone by now :/ >> >> You can consider both WebID itself and the social skills of its >> defenders bad, yet still benefit from following their work. > > What is have seen of their work is that it relies on the same features > that we use on sso.debian.org, and when those will go away, both > sso.debian.org and webid will stop working.
Ah, so you are aware of their work already. Good. > If WebID has a workable plan for what to do after <keygen> disappears, > I haven't seen it. If you have, please send me precise details[1]: I > haven't seen any in https://www.w3.org/mid/20150730174424.GA7779@c I am unaware of them being magicians. Some of them have put together Javascript for execution in the browser. I guess you already know about (and dislike) that workaround. > [1] patches would be even better, because sso.debian.org is a service > that I DO NOT WANT TO MAINTAIN, and I'm just stuck with it because I > seem to be the person in Debian that needs an authentication system > the most (for nm.debian.org and contributors.debian.org). I am aware. Pointing you at fellow developers is as far as my skills reach in this area, unfortunately. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
