On 29 February 2016 at 17:57, Sergey B Kirpichev <skirpic...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 05:22:19PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: >> It pretty clearly says: >> >> | serious; is a severe violation of Debian policy (roughly, it violates >> | a "must" or "required" directive), or, in the package maintainer's or >> | release manager's opinion, makes the package unsuitable for release. > > Yes, _in the package maintainer's_ ... I was package maintainer. Till > now, so you shouln't worry about my opinions anymore.
Sergey, there are no releases of non-release architectures, hence this argument is unfortunately invalid. > Lets end this little lesson. Believe me, some Debian > maintainers _can_ read such simple texts. > >> Right, you can reopen that then. > > Feel free to do this. Is it a new game? -- Cheers, Andrew
