On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 03:20:48PM +0000, Chris Boot wrote: > I guess the bit I don't follow is removing features from various > services, but carrying on maintaining them.
Chopping some overengineering out of debtags.debian.net is something I could actually have fun with. I also hope that by freeing myself from some commitments, I can have fun with some of my todo list items on nm.d.o and contributors.d.o. I still would like not to be alone with the responsibility for them. The offer on http://enricozini.org/2014/debian/on-responsibilities/ still stands. > I realise that with packages one can RFA or totally Orphan them and make > it obvious to other parties that a new maintainer is required. It feels > like perhaps that's lacking for some of the Debian infrastructure services. > > While I don't feel I can realistically volunteer to maintain any of the > things you are trying to orphan, I also had no real idea that this was > on the cards. I'm sure I'm not the only one. > > Do we need a WNP{Services} to improve the visibility of this kind of thing? I think we need something like that. For each web service, we could use at least a list of maintainers and a (private) address that goes to the maintainers, which can be used for things like contact information on html <meta> tags, page footers, cron emails, and error notifications from the site[1]. [1] https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.9/ref/settings/#admins Enrico -- GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <enr...@enricozini.org>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
