On Tue, 19 Jan 2016, Andreas Tille wrote: > > dh exists to optimise the common case, > > with some limited amount of extendability, but in some cases, dh5 style > > works better and/or ensures more legible debian/rules files than dh7 style. > > s?ensures more legible debian/rules?ensures less legible debian/rules?
No, I precisely meant what I wrote. > my bet is that at least 95% of packages featuring old packaging style do > not do these extra means. For the other 5% (and I’m not disputing the figure), the dh5 style is *more* legible. As I said earlier: dh7 style is just optimising the common case, more not. bye, //mirabilos -- <Uli> Du hast Recht. <Uli> Du hast Recht!
