On Jan 15, chrysn <chr...@fsfe.org> wrote: > Right now microcode does not fit in that middle ground from either 1) > (because no DMA to protect us) nor 2) (because things work without as > well). If, at some future point in time, CPUs do require microcode > updates, we might need to revisit this. CPUs *do* require microcode updates: to fix bugs. You can pretend that they still work well enough without updates, or hope that they will come from the BIOS anyway, but this is something that I recommend to my competitors.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
