On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:39:25 +0100, Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.deti...@gmail.com> wrote: >But adding dynamic file support in dpkg is a lot of work.
I am aware of that. That's one of my reasons for advocating giving the needed love to ucf and to deprecate dpkg's conffile functions in favor of ucf. A extended / enhanced ucf can replace dpkg with a lot less work than would be necessary to bring dpkg's conffile handling into the 2020ies decade. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
