Quoting Brian May (2015-10-08 00:11:19) > On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 at 08:35 Nick Phillips <nick.phill...@otago.ac.nz> wrote: > >> Personally, I'd prefer that packages get a default configuration and >> services are never enabled on install. However, I get that some/many >> people would prefer that debconf ask them enough questions to >> configure a package and that the service be enabled by the end of the >> install. > > For a (rare?) example I have had recently where I prefer services > don't get configured or enabled on install, consider build-depends > required for testing. > > I have a python library in Debian that build depends on slapd. > > https://packages.debian.org/sid/python-tldap > > It does this because it has tests that require slapd. The tests create > a slapd database and run slapd on a non-standard port. > > Unfortunately, when slapd gets installed it automatically configures a > database (completely redundant) and starts a slapd instance on the > default ldap port. This means you can't build my package in a schroot > instance on a host that is already running slapd on the port (e.g. > another build instance), because it will fail to install slapd. > > It would be much better (for testing) if I could just install the > slapd daemon without doing any of the automatic configuration.
When you do "debootstrap --variant=buildd" it will add a policy-rc.d file to suppress starting slapd. If schroot doesn't provide such mechanism on its own then consider install policyrcd-script-zg2 package. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
