On 09/06/2015 06:59 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 06/09/15 17:30, Simon Richter wrote: >> I have a package (librevisa) with a C API that uses C++ internally. Can >> I ignore the transition completely because nothing breaks? > > If it is purely internal, then yes this is fine, and you do not need a > rename/transition. Several libraries are in that situation. > > According to <https://titanpad.com/UtA5km2wW6>, someone (I think I dimly > remember it being me) looked at librevisa and assessed it as not needing > a transition on that basis.
I would like to see everything depending on libstdc++6 at least rebuilt once for stretch, if it wasn't already rebuilt. But this is not urgent.
