On Aug 29, Stefano Zacchiroli <z...@debian.org> wrote: > My rationale for this is as follows. First, Debian official installation > image are conceptually part of what we call "Debian", i.e., main. I see > no other possible logical interpretation of where those images reside > w.r.t. the archive categories present in the Social Contract. Second, > in terms of free-ness, it doesn't matter whether something is actually > used by the users, or only distributed. That is the standard we have > upheld since forever in accepting/rejecting packages in main. Not since "forever": only since when the meaning of the DFSG was redefined by "editorial" changes in 2004.
-- ciao, Marco
pgpt9kgeJdYXE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
