On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 01:16:02PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: > So _please_, please choose a different name for the binary in > Debian,[1] because accessing a cloud service (that might not be around > in 10 years, see e.g. Google News as for how such things can disappear > in a relatively short time) is something really, really specific and > really shouldn't take up a generic name that will haunt us for years to > come.
"gdrive" is not too objectionable IMHO. I'd rather not see a package offering "drive" accepted to the archive. > Also, _please_ don't symlink it - because then you're also reserving > the name because people are going to use it. Yes symlinking does not address this problem. > [1] Suggestion: 'gdrive', if that's not already taken by something e.g. > GLib/Gtk+-based (I haven't checked). Oh snap :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150706085814.gb10...@chew.redmars.org
