Am Freitag, den 12.06.2015, 20:50 +1000 schrieb Craig Small: > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 02:05:11PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > With my SRM hat on, we're generally happy to consider the issue resolved if > > the package in unstable contains the correct license information and the > > file(s) involved are other distributable, as at that point it's basically a > > documentation issue rather than a licensing one. Assuming that's the case, > > no separate update for Jessie would be required. > Thanks, I'll document and downgrade (to make it non-RC) the bug. > Yes, its a purely a documentation issue.
Ähm, just a question: the license is *non-commercial*. Is it really distributable in main then? I'd guessed not, but I'm happy to learn something new... -- tobi -- tobi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1434118439.26645.4.ca...@debian.org
