On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:28:38AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Wouter Verhelst <wou...@debian.org> (2015-05-27): > > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 08:47:43PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 19:42:48 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > > > > > > On 25/05/15 18:24, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > > > > On Sunday 24 May 2015 21:27:47 Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > > [snip] > > > > >> Due to the way that the archive manages uploads to proposed-updates, > > > > >> if > > > > >> you upload a .changes file which only includes source and > > > > >> architecture:all packages, please ensure that you rename it to > > > > >> something > > > > >> other than "_$arch.changes". > > > > > > > > Does this only apply to source packages that produce at least one binary > > > > package on $arch, or does it also apply to source packages that solely > > > > produce architecture-independent binaries? > > > > > > > No, the issue is when the maintainer-uploaded .changes file name clashes > > > with the one from a binary (buildd) upload, so if there aren't any > > > architecture-dependent binaries, then this doesn't matter. > > > > Maybe dak should refuse uploads of a _$arch.changes file that does not > > refer to any _$arch.deb files with an appropriate error message? Then > > this isn't an issue. > > You're missing _$arch.changes bundling _$arch.udeb.
No, I forgot about udebs in general :-) The point was, if a .changes file doesn't contain any arch-specific files (debs, udebs, or tar.gz in the case of dpkg), it shouldn't be called _$arch.changes (because it isn't). -- It is easy to love a country that is famous for chocolate and beer -- Barack Obama, speaking in Brussels, Belgium, 2014-03-26 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150529132803.gb20...@grep.be
